Thursday, March 26, 2020

Essay Examples on Van Gogh Essay Example

Essay Examples on Van Gogh Paper 1st Essay Sample on Van Gogh Vincent Van Gogh was a very interesting artist.He was born in 1853. By the time he was 1 ? years old he drew pictures. By age of thirteen, he decided to draw still life. One of thefirst drawings was of his brother, Theo Van Gogh, working in the field. In 1877, at age twenty-four, he went to Amsterdam to study to be a minister. He did not do well there so he went to Brussels, Belgum. He studied art at a small school. He later graduated from the University. Vincent and Theo grew apart. Theo went to France to be a successful art dealer. Vincent worked at a poor mine for money. He stayed at the mine and got fed horribly. Vincent had enough money for food, water, clothes and a bed, but he gave it all to the other workers and became poor. Later he became very sick. When his brother heard that Vincent was sick, he left France to visit him. When he got there, he saw Vincent lying on an uncomfortable bed sick, poor, and hungry. He knew he had to do something. So Theo gave Vincent a monthly amount of money and Vincent got back on track. Then Theo asked Vincent if he wanted to go back to France with him and sell his paintings. In France, Vincent drew the people working in the fields. We will write a custom essay sample on Essay Examples on Van Gogh specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Essay Examples on Van Gogh specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Essay Examples on Van Gogh specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer He used dark colors on bright colors. Though his paintings were great, people did not buy them. So Theo told him to draw other pictures, but Vincent did not want to. I want to draw people doing something. So thats what he did. Vincent was working in the sun too long and soon became both mentally and physically ill. He started to do strange things. He cut his ear off for no reason. Theo found him lying on the bed with bloody towels and put him in the hospital. He was not released for two months. After he was released Vincent wanted to be well so he went to therapy. He continued to paint but he got sick again and was put in jail. Theo paid the money to get Vincent out. 2nd Essay Sample on Van Gogh Van Gogh was born in 1853 and died in 1890.He was a Dutch postimpressionist painter. His works are perhaps better known generally than those of any other painter.The great majority were produced in 29 months of frenzied activity interspersed with epileptoid seizures and despair that finally ended in suicide.His early work, the Dutch period (1880-85), consists of dark, greenish-brown, heavily painted studies of peasants and miners (The Potato Eaters).After moving to Paris, he met Pissarro, who encouraged him to adopt a colorful palette.His work from his last month at Arles is characterized by the heavy impasto and rhythmic linear style so identified with him. Now I am going to tell you about his life and also some of his art work (paintings) Vincent Van Gogh was dorn on March 30, 1853 in the small village of Groot-Zundent, Holland, to Theodorus Van Gogh (1822-1885) and Anna Cornelia nee Carbentus (1819-1907).His brother Theo was born on May 1, 1857. Van Goghs father, a Protestant min ister had hopes that his son would follow in the foot steps of his forebears and become either a clergman or a successful businessman. At an early age and extremely sensitive, Van Gogh, who was prone to frequent bouts of depression, gave indications that he would not be well suited for either professions.At the age of 16 (1869), Van Gogh was recommended by an uncle (Uncle Cent) for a clerical position at Goupil, an art gallery in The Hague.Vincent makes frequent visits to the museums of The Hague.In 1873, Van Gogh transferred to a branch of Goupil in London. He visits the museums and galleries and expands his knowledge of art.Here he experienced hisfirst tragic love affair.Vincent stays in a boarding house ran by Mrs. Ursula Loyer.For decades it has been thought that Vincent was in love with Mrs. Loyers, daughter Eugenie.

Friday, March 6, 2020

The Will To Power Essays - Friedrich Nietzsche, Will To Power

The Will To Power Essays - Friedrich Nietzsche, Will To Power the Will to Power In the Will to Power, Nietzsche claims: The will to power interprets (-it is a question of interpretation when an organ is constructed): it defines limits, determines degrees, variations of power. Mere variations of power could not feel themselves to be such: there must be present something that wants to grow and interprets the value of whatever else wants to grow. Equal in that- In fact, interpretation is itself a means of becoming master of something. (The organic process constantly presupposes interpretations.) Part I of this paper unpacks this passage concerning the nature of interpretation to reach the crux of Nietzsche's argument. Part II then contextualizes this argument with respect to his claims regarding perspectivism and interpretation. Finally Part III raises the most plausible critique of Nietzsche's claim of perspectivism as possible responses by Nietzsche in his defense. I. Analysis In the passage above, Nietzsche claims that it is not human beings which interpret, but rather, it is "the will to power [that] interprets." As discussed in lecture, the organic process which presupposes interpretation is essentially the very process of adaptation by which an organism tries to fit itself into its environment and to other species around it, such as its predators and its prey. This process is a way in which the organism physiologically interprets the world. So interaction is the fundamental phenomenon of the forces that make up the will to power and these interactions in so far as they are systematically centered around a particular center of power, can be called a perspective or interpretation which that center of force gives of its surrounding environment. And what we think of as this specifically human interpretation is only the conscious psychological realization of this much more fundamental law of nature. Thus it is the will to power that interpreter! s, and it does so by appropriating, that is, knowledge is a process of appropriation. To understand what Nietzsche means by appropriation here, we can look to section 515 where he states "not 'to know' but to schematize-to impose upon chaos as much regularity and for as our practical needs require." In this statement, Nietzsche claims that interpretation is "to impose upon chaos as much regularity and form as our practical needs require." So for the plant, or some animal that preys on its environment, they will distinguish only between things that are useful and that which is not useful to the individual. The predator has no sense of distinction between this or that individual fly; one fly is all the same because it is simply food. However, in treating these different bits of prey as equal, it schematizes and organizes, and simplifies the world for itself. That is, once we start to recognize them as equal-this is the same as that-we begin to categorize them accordingly. ! Sluga illustrates how as human beings we say: "that this person which I just met a couple days ago is still the same person, although he has changed in slight ways, maybe he was wearing a cap back then." As human beings, we recognize there is a difference, but the difference is not important to us. In this process of equalization, man imposes schema and order on the world; and that is really the nature of interpretation and the will to power. II Contextualization of Nietzsche's Argument Having completed my analysis of Nietzsche's discussion in section 643, I would now like to move on to contextualize the implications of this claim with respect to perspectivism. To begin, section 636 we see how Nietzsche connects the concepts of perspective and interpretation with the concept of the will to power. According to Nietzsche, Physicists believe in a "true world" in their own fashion: a firm systematization of atoms in necessary motion, the same for all beings-so for them the "apparent world" is reduced to the side of universal and universally necessary being which is accessible to every being in its own way (accessible and also already adapted- made "subjective"). Physicist, in other words, are inclined towards a kind of metaphysics which says that there is a true reality different from the way it looks to us, namely, for physicist, it is the reality of atoms and their